Mesopotamian Expeditionary Force, Operation Iraqi Freedom, Indian Soldiers' Letters, Religious War, Academic War Coverage, Newspaper War CoverageAugust 8, 2006 1:19 pm

They were called upon to fight a Muslim enemy, alongside comrades who sometimes questioned their loyalty. They returned home to neighborhoods where the occupation is commonly dismissed as an imperialist crusade, and where Muslims who serve in Iraq are often disparaged as traitors.

 

This is from yesterday’s Times, a story about Muslims in the Marines. Arabic fluency is an asset in Iraq (despite inital accent acclimation), but for the Arabic-speaking American soldiers, in this case 5 Yemeni-American brothers and cousins from Brooklyn, knowing Arabic meant no war filter. "They heard what their comrades could not. A frantic sequence of foreign words was, they knew, a girl crying out that her father was dead."

Not only were they, in the words of one of these Brooklyn-by-Yemen men, "not as foreign" as other Marines in Iraq, they had to frame the Islamic questions of when Muslims may kill other Muslims with their desire to serve in the Marines. Some of the men from this set of brothers and cousins, back in Brooklyn, respond tepidly to reporters questions about Iraq ("you can’t say ‘purple heart’ in Arabic"), while another shouts "Yeah, we’re going to Yemen next!"

I read this story and instantly thought of the mutiny of the 15th Lancers in Iraq in 1916, detailed in Indian letters from David Omissi’s Indian Voices of the Great War. In February 1916, the 15th Lancers - all Indian Muslims - refused to march from Basra to the front; they wouldn’t fight other Muslims so close to the Holy Places of Karbala, Najaf and Baghdad. The Muslim Marines from Brooklyn described in the Times served ably in Iraq. The closest thing to mutiny, perhaps, was after the war when one of them fled an arranged marriage in Yemen to marry his New York girlfriend. But the attitudes of their fathers, wives, and friends in the story - "It’s a sin. Nobody kills other Muslims. They’re like brothers." - were acted on by foreign, Muslim soldiers in Iraq before, 90 years ago.


A regiment of Indian Lancers preparing to charge.

Here are some of the letters, all from Omissi’s book:

Ashraf Ali Khan to Signalling Instructor Dafadar Fateh Mahomed Khan (Hindustani Muslim, 6th Cavalry, France)

6th Cavalry
Sialkot
24th March 1916

We have got the depot of the 15th Lancers here now; and they were in France from the beginning of the war, and went thence to Basra. The whole regiment united there for the purpose of taking an oath not to fight against Muslims. They all took the oath and laid the Qu’ran on their heads, and swore not to tell anyone of their compact. But a jemadar of that regiment told the CO all about the affair. He at once ordered the ‘fall in’ to be sounded and everyone had to fall in just as he was, whether dressed or not. When the men had fallen in, the other regiments took possession of their arms. They were then ordered to embark on a ship and all refused.
    After that it was decided that the denial of the Indian commissioned officers of all knowledge of the affair should be accepted. They denied it all (in spite of the fact that they too had sworn on the Qu’ran) and they were acquitted. The rest - the non-commissioned officers and troopers, 429 in number - were arrested and punished with various terms of imprisonment.

Rahimdad Khan (Pathan) to Sher Khan (Mirpur, Kashmir?)

19th Lancers
France
21st May 1916

I learn from Karamdad’s letter that Fateh Khan has been sent to transportation [for mutiny]. A thousand pities! It is a subject for great thankfulness that Alladad Khan escaped as he was in hospital at Bushire [Persia]. 439 cavalrymen [of the 15th Lancers] were transported for refusing to fight against the Turks. This was a great mistake to behave to our king in this way. The enemy no doubt are Turks, but in spite of this our men ought not to have been untrue to their salt. It is a thousand pities that I, poor creature as I am, can do nothing in the matter. Well, we must have patience and trust that in time they will be released. I hope so, for there is great talk about the matter.


Fateh Ullah (Punjabi Muslim) to Fateh Ahmed
(Supply and Transport No. 5 Base Supply Depot, France)

Lyallpur
Punjab
30th June 1916

We have learnt from Nasir Khan’s letter that his brother Raja Khan has been sentenced by court martial to fourteen years’ imprisonment. This has caused us much grief. The details which he gives are that when the 15th Lancers reached Basra they were ordered to fight against the Turks. They, however, declined to take up arms against their brother Muslims and asked to be sent to some other theatre of war. A court martial was convened and 400 men were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment. Since then, it has been reported in the newspapers that the new Viceroy has ordered that these men should be sent to some other theatre of war, since they did not in reality decline to fight for the Sirkar, and should not have been called upon to fight against the Turks against their wish. I do not know why action has not been taken on this order. It is very sad that fate should have dealth thus cruelly with this regiment in the end, after they had done such good service and gained so much renown elsewhere. Now they are all imprisoned in the fort Rangoon in Burma, and are not allowed to receive or send letters. My idea is that the Government have acted in this way simply to vindicate their authority, and that after the war all these unfortunates will be released.

In fact, a year later in summer of 1917, on the King’s birthday, the 15th Lancers were released.

Mesopotamian Expeditionary Force, Operation Iraqi Freedom, American Soldiers' Letters, Religious War, Magazine War CoverageAugust 1, 2006 7:18 pm

Runaway Raft on the Tigris (via Harper’s).

I’ve been going through Andrew Carroll’s two anthologies of war letters recently, trying to decide which letters to except and add to the archive here. Having just read Ken Silverstein’s feature in the newest Harper’s on the rise of Shi’a Iraqi death squads, this letter stood out. A Marine writes to his priest back home a month after Shock and Awe:

Father Bob,

With religious banners flying, truckload after truckload of cheering Iraqis pass our position. After decades of religious oppression, the Shi’a muslims are now free to worship as they wish. Old men have tears of joy and the younger generation try to thank us the best they can in their broken English. "Thank You America" and "Mr. Bush… good" are about all the Marines can understand, but the sight of the liberated people is an incredible gift to all of us on this most wonderful Easter.

Andrew Carroll, editor, Behind the Lines, (New York: 2006) p. 211.

Lieut. General Sir Stanley Maude issued a proclamation to the inhabitants of Baghdad on March 19, 1917, after the city finally fell to the British-Indian forces and just over a week after their ceremonial entrance into Baghdad (depicted in the photograph in the header).  The proclamation began:

Our military operations have as their object the defeat of the enemy, and the driving of him from these territories. In order to complete this task, I am charged with absolute and supreme control of all regions in which British troops operate; but our armies do not come into your cities and lands as conquerors or enemies, but as liberators.
And included the following:

Many noble Arabs have perished in the cause of Arab freedom, at the hands of those alien rulers, the Turks, who oppressed them. It is the determination of the Government of Great Britain and the great Powers allied to Great Britain that these noble Arabs shall not have suffered in vain. It is the hope and desire of the British people and the nations in alliance with them that the Arab race may rise once more to greatness and renown among the peoples of the earth, and that it shall bind itself together to this end in unity and concord
Maude hoped for a smooth colonial administration embodying just enough of the ideals expressed in the proclamation to keep the native population calm. That did not happen. What resulted instead was a Shi’a-Sunni-united rebellion against the British in 1920, known widely as the Arab Revolt, though memorialized in Iraq as the Great Iraqi Revolution.

Imperial British proclamations in newly-captured Baghdad can’t be compared directly to a soldier writing to his priest in 2003, relaying the joy of people free to worship. Some of Paul Bremer’s speeches are the more obvious comparisons to Maude. But in their contrast, the 1917 proclamation and this letter together express to how far things fell in Iraq in the years following both "successful" invasions. That, and the limits of "liberators."

Indian Soldiers' Letters, American Soldiers' Letters, Religious War, Magazine War CoverageJune 9, 2006 12:52 pm

New Yorker cover   

    The current New Yorker features a cover of entrenched soldiers, one reading by flashlight, and inside 12 pages of soldiers’ letters anchor their "Life During Wartime" issue. A selection from "Dispatches from Iraq: Soldiers’ Stories" can be heard on The New Yorker’s website; if audio tracks of war letters are of interest, more can be heard at the Gilder Lehrman Institute—letters from the American Revolution to the current war.

   From this New Yorker: in 2003, Captain Donna Kahout wrote to members of her Colorado church about fighting on religious land:

   One clear day, I looked down at the rich greens of the valley between the Tigris and Euphrates and pondered over the fact that these were the Tigris and Euphrates that I’d learned about in chruch and school my whole life. Genesis describes the Garden of Eden standing at the headwater of four rivers, two of which are the Tigris and Euphrates. That places the Garden just north of Basa, within sight of where I flew almost daily.

   Abraham, Daniel, Ezra, Nehemiah, the whole displaced Israelite nation, and perhaps even Adam and Eve all trod the ground I was looking down on daily. And I was living in the same desert where the Israelities wandered. We complain about being there for three months—it’s so barren, flat, windy, hot, sandy, and dry—it’s no wonder the Israelites complained during the forty years that they followed God around the Sinai Peninsula between their exodus from Egypt and their entrance into the Promised Land, near Jerusalem.

medical
Indian medical orderlies attending to wounded soldiers on stretchers outside a dressing station, Mesopotamia, 1914-1918.

    While current soldiers remark at a combat zone with Biblical connection, some of the Indian soldiers in Iraq in the 1910s, trodding the same ground, refused to fight against the local population for their own religious reasons. A 1916 letter from a Punjabi Muslim named Fateh Ullah to his friend, Fateh Ahmed, who was stationed in France, relates a friend’s refusal to fight in Mesopotamia:

    We have learnt from Nasir Khan’s letter that his brother Raja Khan has been sentenced by court martial to fourteen years’ imprisonment. This has caused us much grief. The details which he gives are that when the 15th Lancers reach Basra they were ordered to fight against the Turks. They, however, declined to take up arms against their brother Muslims and asked to be sent to some other theatre of war. A court martial was convened and 400 men were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment.

- David Omissi, Indian Voices of the Great War (London, 1999), p. 199.